Flux control efficiency: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{MitoPedia | {{MitoPedia | ||
|abbr=''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' | |abbr=''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' | ||
|description='''Flux | |description='''Flux control efficiencies''' express the control of respiration by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', as a fractional change of flux from ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'', normalized for ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' is the [[reference state]] with high (stimulated or un-inhibited) flux; ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is the [[background state]] at low flux, upon which ''X'' acts. | ||
:: ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' = (''Z<sub>X</sub>-Y<sub>X</sub>'')/''Z<sub>X</sub>'' = 1-''Y<sub>X</sub>''/''Z<sub>X</sub>'' | :: ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' = (''Z<sub>X</sub>-Y<sub>X</sub>'')/''Z<sub>X</sub>'' = 1-''Y<sub>X</sub>''/''Z<sub>X</sub>'' | ||
Complementary to the concept of [[flux | Complementary to the concept of [[flux control ratio]]s and analogous to [[elasticity|elasticities]] of [[metabolic control analysis]], the flux control efficiency of ''X'' upon background ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is expressed as the change of flux from ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' normalized for the reference state ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. | ||
» [[Flux_control_efficiency#Flux_control_efficiency:_normalization_of_mitochondrial_respiration | '''MiPNet article''']] | » [[Flux_control_efficiency#Flux_control_efficiency:_normalization_of_mitochondrial_respiration | '''MiPNet article''']] | ||
|info=[[Gnaiger 2020 MitoPathways]] | |info=[[Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
= Flux | = Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration = | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Gnaiger E (2020) Flux | |title=Gnaiger E (2020) Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondr Physiol Network 2016-03-20; updated 2020-11-10. | ||
|info=[[Gnaiger 2020 MitoPathways]] | |info=[[Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways]] | ||
|authors=Oroboros | |authors=Oroboros | ||
|year=2020 | |year=2020 | ||
|journal=MiPNet | |journal=MiPNet | ||
|abstract=The [[flux | |abstract=The [[flux control efficiency]], ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'', and [[flux control ratio]], ''FCR'', are internal normalizations, expressing respiratory flux in a given state relative to respiratory flux in a reference state. Whereas ''FCR''s express various respiratory states relative to a common refrence state, ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' express the control of respiration in a single ''step'' caused by a specific metabolic control variable ''X''. The concept of the flux control efficiency presents a generalized framework for assessing the effect of an experimental variable on flux and defines specific expressions, such as the biochemical coupling efficiency. | ||
|mipnetlab=AT Innsbruck Gnaiger E | |mipnetlab=AT Innsbruck Gnaiger E | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Metabolic control variable and respiratory state == | == Metabolic control variable and respiratory state == | ||
:::: A [[metabolic control variable]] ''X'' is either added (stimulation, activation) or removed (reversal of inhibition) to yield a high flux ''Z'' in the [[reference state]], compared to flux ''Y'' in the [[background state]]. ''X'' denotes the metabolic control variable; Y and Z are the respiratory states, whereas ''Y'' and ''Z'' denote the corresponding respiratory fluxes. ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' in ''step analysis'' relates to the change of flux caused by the variable ''X''. The ''FCR'' in ''state analysis'' compares fluxes in a variety of respiratory states which may be separated by single or multiple variables, i.e. separated by several [[Coupling-control state |coupling]] and [[pathway control | :::: A [[metabolic control variable]] ''X'' is either added (stimulation, activation) or removed (reversal of inhibition) to yield a high flux ''Z'' in the [[reference state]], compared to flux ''Y'' in the [[background state]]. ''X'' denotes the metabolic control variable; Y and Z are the respiratory states, whereas ''Y'' and ''Z'' denote the corresponding respiratory fluxes. ''j<sub>Z-Y</sub>'' in ''step analysis'' relates to the change of flux caused by the variable ''X''. The ''FCR'' in ''state analysis'' compares fluxes in a variety of respiratory states which may be separated by single or multiple variables, i.e. separated by several [[Coupling-control state |coupling]] and [[pathway control states]]. | ||
:::: If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-''X''); then ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is the background rate in the presence of the inhibitor. | :::: If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-''X''); then ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' is the background rate in the presence of the inhibitor. | ||
::::* ''X'': '''Metabolic control variable''' acting on ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[background state]], to yield rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[reference state]]. ''X'' stimulates or un-inhibits ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' from low flux to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' at high flux. | ::::* ''X'': '''Metabolic control variable''' acting on ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[background state]], to yield rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[reference state]]. ''X'' stimulates or un-inhibits ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' from low flux to ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' at high flux. | ||
::::* ''Y<sub>X</sub>'': The rate in the '''background state''' Y is the non-activated or inhibited respiratory rate (low) in relation to the high rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[reference state]] Z. A [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', acts on ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' (substrate, activator) or is removed from Y (inhibitor) to yield ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. The ''X''-specific (in contrast to general) [[flux | ::::* ''Y<sub>X</sub>'': The rate in the '''background state''' Y is the non-activated or inhibited respiratory rate (low) in relation to the high rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[reference state]] Z. A [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', acts on ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' (substrate, activator) or is removed from Y (inhibitor) to yield ''Z<sub>X</sub>''. The ''X''-specific (in contrast to general) [[flux control ratio]] is ''Y/Z''. | ||
::::* ''Z<sub>X</sub>'': The rate in the '''reference state''' Z, stimulated or un-inhibited by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', with high rate in relation to rate ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[background state]] Y. | ::::* ''Z<sub>X</sub>'': The rate in the '''reference state''' Z, stimulated or un-inhibited by a [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', with high rate in relation to rate ''Y<sub>X</sub>'' in the [[background state]] Y. | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:::: [[Pathway control efficiency |Pathway control efficiencies]] express the relative change of oxygen flux in response to a transition of (''1'') CHNO-fuel substrates or (''2'') inhibitors of enzyme steps in the pathway, in a defined coupling state. | :::: [[Pathway control efficiency |Pathway control efficiencies]] express the relative change of oxygen flux in response to a transition of (''1'') CHNO-fuel substrates or (''2'') inhibitors of enzyme steps in the pathway, in a defined coupling state. | ||
::::» [[NS-N | ::::» [[NS-N pathway control efficiency]] | ||
== Coupling control efficiency == | == Coupling-control efficiency == | ||
:::: [[Coupling control efficiency |Coupling control efficiencies]] are determined in an [[ET-pathway competent state]]. The terms ''coupling efficiency'' and ''coupling control efficiency'' are used synonymously. | :::: [[Coupling-control efficiency |Coupling-control efficiencies]] are determined in an [[ET-pathway competent state]]. The terms ''coupling efficiency'' and ''coupling-control efficiency'' are used synonymously. | ||
=== mt-Preparations === | === mt-Preparations === | ||
:::: [[Image:P.jpg|link=OXPHOS capacity|OXPHOS]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ET | :::: [[Image:P.jpg|link=OXPHOS capacity|OXPHOS]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ET capacity|ET capacity]] In mitochondrial preparations, there are three well-defined coupling states of respiration, ''L'', ''P'', ''E'' ([[LEAK respiration]], [[OXPHOS]], [[Electron transfer pathway]]). | ||
::: 1. If the [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', is an [[uncoupler]], the reference rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s ''Y'', of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on | ::: 1. If the [[metabolic control variable]], ''X'', is an [[uncoupler]], the reference rate ''Z<sub>X</sub>'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s ''Y'', of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on ''L'' or ''P'' in mt-preparations. The corresponding flux control efficiencies are: | ||
::::* [[ | ::::* [[E-L coupling efficiency |''E-L'' coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-L</sub>'' = (''E-L'')/''E'' = 1-''L/E''. | ||
::::* [[ | ::::* [[E-P control efficiency |''E-P'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-P</sub>'' = (''E-P'')/''E'' = 1-''P/E''. | ||
::: 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by [[ADP]], D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference | ::: 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by [[ADP]], D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate ''Z'' is ''P'' at saturating concentrations of ADP. The background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding flux control efficiency is: | ||
::::* [[ | ::::* [[P-L control efficiency |''P-L'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>P-L</sub>'' = (''P-L'')/''P'' = 1-''L/P'', related to the RCR. | ||
::: 3. If the background | ::: 3. If the background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''P'' is ADP-saturated ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control ratio is expressed as the [[net P/E control ratio |net ''P/E'' control ratio]] (compare 1 and 2): | ||
::::* (''P-L'')/''E'' | ::::* (''P-L'')/''E'' | ||
=== Living cells === | === Living cells === | ||
:::: [[Image:R.jpg|link=ROUTINE respiration|ROUTINE]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ET capacity|ET capacity]] ''L''(Omy) and ''E'' can be induced in living cells, but | :::: [[Image:R.jpg|link=ROUTINE respiration|ROUTINE]] [[Image:L.jpg|link=LEAK respiration|LEAK]] [[Image:E.jpg|link=ET capacity|ET capacity]] ''L''(Omy) and ''E'' can be induced in living cells, but rate ''P'' cannot. However, the [[ROUTINE]] rate of respiration ''R'' can be measured in living cells. | ||
:::1. If the [[metabolic control variable]] | :::1. If the [[metabolic control variable]] ''X'' is an [[uncoupler]], the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E''. Then two [[background state]]s, Y of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the LEAK respiration or ROUTINE state in living cells. The corresponding coupling control efficiencies are: | ||
::::* [[ | ::::* [[E-L coupling efficiency |''E-L'' coupling efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-L</sub>'' = (''E-L'')/''E'' = 1-''L/E''. | ||
::::* [[ | ::::* [[E-R control efficiency |''E-R'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>E-R</sub>'' = (''E-R'')/''E'' = 1-''R/E''. | ||
:::2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate ''Z'' is ''R'' in living cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding | :::2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP ([[DT-phosphorylation]]; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate ''Z'' is ''R'' in living cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', and the corresponding flux control efficiency is: | ||
::::* [[ | ::::* [[R-L control efficiency |''R-L'' control efficiency]], ''j<sub>R-L</sub>'' = (''R-L'')/''R'' = 1-''L/R''. | ||
:::3. If the background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''R'' is cell-controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control | :::3. If the background rate ''Y'' is ''L'', the metablic control variable from ''L'' to ''R'' is cell-controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate ''Z'' is ''E'', the coupling control ratio is expressed as the [[net R/E control ratio |net ''R/E'' control ratio]] (compare 1 and 2): | ||
::::* (''R-L'')/''E'' | ::::* (''R-L'')/''E'' | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
::::* [[Gnaiger 2020 MitoPathways]] | ::::* [[Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways]] | ||
::::* [[Gnaiger 2015 Scand J Med Sci Sports]] | ::::* [[Gnaiger 2015 Scand J Med Sci Sports]] | ||
::::* [[Gnaiger 2013 Abstract MiP2013|Biochemical coupling efficiency in permeabilized fibres from arm and leg muscle in Inuit versus Caucasians: A functional test of the uncoupling hypothesis in Greenland. Mitochondr Physiol Network 18.08.]] | ::::* [[Gnaiger 2013 Abstract MiP2013|Biochemical coupling efficiency in permeabilized fibres from arm and leg muscle in Inuit versus Caucasians: A functional test of the uncoupling hypothesis in Greenland. Mitochondr Physiol Network 18.08.]] | ||
== Keywords == | |||
::::* Expand Bioblast links to '''Flux control efficiency''' | |||
{{Template:Keywords: Coupling control}} | |||
{{Template:Keywords: Normalization}} | {{Template:Keywords: Normalization}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:27, 1 January 2021
Description
Flux control efficiencies express the control of respiration by a metabolic control variable, X, as a fractional change of flux from YX to ZX, normalized for ZX. ZX is the reference state with high (stimulated or un-inhibited) flux; YX is the background state at low flux, upon which X acts.
- jZ-Y = (ZX-YX)/ZX = 1-YX/ZX
Complementary to the concept of flux control ratios and analogous to elasticities of metabolic control analysis, the flux control efficiency of X upon background YX is expressed as the change of flux from YX to ZX normalized for the reference state ZX. » MiPNet article
Abbreviation: jZ-Y
Reference: Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways
Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration
Gnaiger E (2020) Flux control efficiency: normalization of mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondr Physiol Network 2016-03-20; updated 2020-11-10. |
» Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways
Abstract: The flux control efficiency, jZ-Y, and flux control ratio, FCR, are internal normalizations, expressing respiratory flux in a given state relative to respiratory flux in a reference state. Whereas FCRs express various respiratory states relative to a common refrence state, jZ-Y express the control of respiration in a single step caused by a specific metabolic control variable X. The concept of the flux control efficiency presents a generalized framework for assessing the effect of an experimental variable on flux and defines specific expressions, such as the biochemical coupling efficiency.
• O2k-Network Lab: AT Innsbruck Gnaiger E
Metabolic control variable and respiratory state
- A metabolic control variable X is either added (stimulation, activation) or removed (reversal of inhibition) to yield a high flux Z in the reference state, compared to flux Y in the background state. X denotes the metabolic control variable; Y and Z are the respiratory states, whereas Y and Z denote the corresponding respiratory fluxes. jZ-Y in step analysis relates to the change of flux caused by the variable X. The FCR in state analysis compares fluxes in a variety of respiratory states which may be separated by single or multiple variables, i.e. separated by several coupling and pathway control states.
- If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-X); then YX is the background rate in the presence of the inhibitor.
- X: Metabolic control variable acting on YX in the background state, to yield rate ZX in the reference state. X stimulates or un-inhibits YX from low flux to ZX at high flux.
- YX: The rate in the background state Y is the non-activated or inhibited respiratory rate (low) in relation to the high rate ZX in the reference state Z. A metabolic control variable, X, acts on YX (substrate, activator) or is removed from Y (inhibitor) to yield ZX. The X-specific (in contrast to general) flux control ratio is Y/Z.
- ZX: The rate in the reference state Z, stimulated or un-inhibited by a metabolic control variable, X, with high rate in relation to rate YX in the background state Y.
- If inhibitors are experimentally added rather than removed (-X); then YX is the background rate in the presence of the inhibitor.
Pathway control efficiency
- Pathway control efficiencies express the relative change of oxygen flux in response to a transition of (1) CHNO-fuel substrates or (2) inhibitors of enzyme steps in the pathway, in a defined coupling state.
- » NS-N pathway control efficiency
Coupling-control efficiency
- Coupling-control efficiencies are determined in an ET-pathway competent state. The terms coupling efficiency and coupling-control efficiency are used synonymously.
mt-Preparations
- In mitochondrial preparations, there are three well-defined coupling states of respiration, L, P, E (LEAK respiration, OXPHOS, Electron transfer pathway).
- 1. If the metabolic control variable, X, is an uncoupler, the reference rate ZX is E. Then two background states Y, of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on L or P in mt-preparations. The corresponding flux control efficiencies are:
- E-L coupling efficiency, jE-L = (E-L)/E = 1-L/E.
- E-P control efficiency, jE-P = (E-P)/E = 1-P/E.
- 1. If the metabolic control variable, X, is an uncoupler, the reference rate ZX is E. Then two background states Y, of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on L or P in mt-preparations. The corresponding flux control efficiencies are:
- 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ADP, D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP (DT-phosphorylation; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate Z is P at saturating concentrations of ADP. The background rate Y is L, and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:
- P-L control efficiency, jP-L = (P-L)/P = 1-L/P, related to the RCR.
- 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ADP, D, or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP (DT-phosphorylation; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate Z is P at saturating concentrations of ADP. The background rate Y is L, and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:
- 3. If the background rate Y is L, the metablic control variable from L to P is ADP-saturated ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate Z is E, the coupling control ratio is expressed as the net P/E control ratio (compare 1 and 2):
- (P-L)/E
- 3. If the background rate Y is L, the metablic control variable from L to P is ADP-saturated ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate Z is E, the coupling control ratio is expressed as the net P/E control ratio (compare 1 and 2):
Living cells
- L(Omy) and E can be induced in living cells, but rate P cannot. However, the ROUTINE rate of respiration R can be measured in living cells.
- 1. If the metabolic control variable X is an uncoupler, the reference rate Z is E. Then two background states, Y of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the LEAK respiration or ROUTINE state in living cells. The corresponding coupling control efficiencies are:
- E-L coupling efficiency, jE-L = (E-L)/E = 1-L/E.
- E-R control efficiency, jE-R = (E-R)/E = 1-R/E.
- 1. If the metabolic control variable X is an uncoupler, the reference rate Z is E. Then two background states, Y of coupling control are possible: The uncoupler may act on the LEAK respiration or ROUTINE state in living cells. The corresponding coupling control efficiencies are:
- 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP (DT-phosphorylation; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate Z is R in living cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background rate Y is L, and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:
- R-L control efficiency, jR-L = (R-L)/R = 1-L/R.
- 2. If the metabolic control variable is stimulation by ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP (DT-phosphorylation; e.g. -Omy), the reference rate Z is R in living cells at physiologically controlled steady states of [ADP] and ATP-turnover. The background rate Y is L, and the corresponding flux control efficiency is:
- 3. If the background rate Y is L, the metablic control variable from L to R is cell-controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate Z is E, the coupling control ratio is expressed as the net R/E control ratio (compare 1 and 2):
- (R-L)/E
- 3. If the background rate Y is L, the metablic control variable from L to R is cell-controlled ATP turnover or release of an inhibitor of phosphorylation of ADP to ATP, and the reference rate Z is E, the coupling control ratio is expressed as the net R/E control ratio (compare 1 and 2):
References
Keywords
- Expand Bioblast links to Flux control efficiency
4-compartmental OXPHOS model. (1) ET capacity E of the noncoupled electron transfer system ETS. OXPHOS capacity P is partitioned into (2) the dissipative LEAK component L, and (3) ADP-stimulated P-L net OXPHOS capacity. (4) If P-L is kinetically limited by a low capacity of the phosphorylation system to utilize the protonmotive force pmF, then the apparent E-P excess capacity is available to drive coupled processes other than phosphorylation P» (ADP to ATP) without competing with P».
- Bioblast links: Coupling control - >>>>>>> - Click on [Expand] or [Collapse] - >>>>>>>
1. Mitochondrial and cellular respiratory rates in coupling-control states
Respiratory rate | Defining relations | Icon | |
---|---|---|---|
OXPHOS capacity | P = P´-Rox | mt-preparations | |
ROUTINE respiration | R = R´-Rox | living cells | |
ET capacity | E = E´-Rox | » Level flow | |
» Noncoupled respiration - Uncoupler | |||
LEAK respiration | L = L´-Rox | » Static head | |
» LEAK state with ATP | |||
» LEAK state with oligomycin | |||
» LEAK state without adenylates | |||
Residual oxygen consumption Rox | L = L´-Rox |
2. Flux control ratios related to coupling in mt-preparations and living cells
FCR | Definition | Icon | |
---|---|---|---|
L/P coupling-control ratio | L/P | » Respiratory acceptor control ratio, RCR = P/L | |
L/R coupling-control ratio | L/R | ||
L/E coupling-control ratio | L/E | » Uncoupling-control ratio, UCR = E/L (ambiguous) | |
P/E control ratio | P/E | ||
R/E control ratio | R/E | » Uncoupling-control ratio, UCR = E/L | |
net P/E control ratio | (P-L)/E | ||
net R/E control ratio | (R-L)/E |
3. Net, excess, and reserve capacities of respiration
Respiratory net rate | Definition | Icon |
---|---|---|
P-L net OXPHOS capacity | P-L | |
R-L net ROUTINE capacity | R-L | |
E-L net ET capacity | E-L | |
E-P excess capacity | E-P | |
E-R reserve capacity | E-R |
4. Flux control efficiencies related to coupling-control ratios
Coupling-control efficiency | Definition | Icon | Canonical term | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P-L control efficiency | jP-L | = (P-L)/P | = 1-L/P | P-L OXPHOS-flux control efficiency | |
R-L control efficiency | jR-L | = (R-L)/R | = 1-L/R | R-L ROUTINE-flux control efficiency | |
E-L coupling efficiency | jE-L | = (E-L)/E | = 1-L/E | E-L ET-coupling efficiency » Biochemical coupling efficiency | |
E-P control efficiency | jE-P | = (E-P)/E | = 1-P/E | E-P ET-excess flux control efficiency | |
E-R control efficiency | jE-R | = (E-R)/E | = 1-R/E | E-R ET-reserve flux control efficiency |
5. General
- » Basal respiration
- » Cell ergometry
- » Dyscoupled respiration
- » Dyscoupling
- » Electron leak
- » Electron-transfer-pathway state
- » Hyphenation
- » Oxidative phosphorylation
- » Oxygen flow
- » Oxygen flux
- » Permeabilized cells
- » Phosphorylation system
- » Proton leak
- » Proton slip
- » Respiratory state
- » Uncoupling
- Bioblast links: Normalization - >>>>>>> - Click on [Expand] or [Collapse] - >>>>>>>
- Quantities for normalization
- » Count in contrast to Number
- » Mitochondrial marker
- » O2k-Protocols: mitochondrial and marker-enzymes
- » Citrate synthase activity
- Quantities for normalization
- General
- Related keyword lists
MitoPedia concepts:
MiP concept,
Respiratory control ratio,
SUIT concept
MitoPedia methods:
Respirometry
Labels: MiParea: Respiration
Regulation: Flux control
HRR: Theory