AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods: Difference between revisions

From Bioblast
No edit summary
m (Iglesias-Gonzalez Javier moved page Analytical 2016 to AMCTB 2016 Anal Methods)
Β 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Publication
{{Publication
|title=Analytical methods committee (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingβ€”their meanings, and some common misconceptions. RSC 74.
|title=Analytical methods committee, AMCTB No. 74 (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingβ€”their meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555.
|info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access]
|info=[https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2016/ay/c6ay90078j Open Access]
|authors=Analytical methods committee
|authors=Analytical methods committee
Line 8: Line 8:
|editor=[[Iglesias-Gonzalez J]]
|editor=[[Iglesias-Gonzalez J]]
}}
}}
== Cited by ==
{{Template:Cited by Iglesias-Gonzalez 2021 MitoFit PT}}
{{Labeling
{{Labeling
|additional=MitoFit 2021 PT
|additional=MitoFit 2021 PT
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:47, 26 January 2021

Publications in the MiPMap
Analytical methods committee, AMCTB No. 74 (2016) z-Scores and other scores in chemical proficiency testingβ€”their meanings, and some common misconceptions. Anal Methods 8:5553-5555.

Β» Open Access

Analytical methods committee (2016) Anal Methods

Abstract: z-Scores were devised to provide a transparent but widely-applicable scoring system for participants in proficiency tests for analytical laboratories. The essential idea is to provide an appropriate scaling of the difference between a participant’s result and the β€˜assigned value’ for the concentration of the analyte. Interpretation of a z-score is straightforward but some aspects need careful attention to avoid misconception. Over time several related scores have been devised to cope with a diversified range of applications. The main types of score have recently been codified in ISO 13528 (2015).

β€’ Bioblast editor: Iglesias-Gonzalez J


Cited by

  • Iglesias-Gonzalez et al (2021) Proficiency test in mt-respiration: A necessary tool for reliable and reproducible results. MitoFit Preprints 2021 (in prep).


Labels:






MitoFit 2021 PT 

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.