Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "BEC reviewers"

From Bioblast
(Created page with "{{BEC page name}} :::: <big><big>'''Bioenergetics Communications''' is the Oroboros Ecosystem journal for publishing and sharing scientific and technical advances in bioenerge...")
Β 
Β 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{BEC page name}}
{{BEC page name}}
:::: <big><big>'''Bioenergetics Communications''' is the Oroboros Ecosystem journal for publishing and sharing scientific and technical advances in bioenergetics, mitochondrial physiology, and particularly high-resolution respirometry</big></big>


[[File:BEC-exlibris.png|right|340px|Bioenergetics Communications]]
:::: <big>Visit the the Bioenergetics Communications website for Β» [https://www.bioenergetics-communications.org/index.php/bec/board_of_reviewers '''BEC board of reviewers''' ]</big>
:::::::: '''<big>Β»[[Bioenerg Commun]]Β«</big>'''
__TOC__


== Reviewer's assessment ==
{{MitoPedia topics
Β 
|mitopedia topic=BEC
:::# Manuscript #
}}
:::# Submission Date
:::# Current Stage
:::# Title
:::# Category
:::# Contributing Authors
:::# Associate Editor
Β 
== Recommendation ==
Β 
=== BEC spedific ===
::::* Is the topic suitable for the journal's aims and scope?
:::# Yes
:::# No
Β 
=== Scientific content ===
:::# Original
:::# Confirmatory
:::# Too preliminary
:::# Trivial
Β 
=== Experimental approach ===
:::# Innovative
:::# Advanced
:::# Standard
:::# Inadequate
Β 
=== Presentation of the data ===
:::# Adequate
:::# Not appropriate
Β 
=== Conclusions ===
:::# Justified
:::# Too speculative
:::# Unjustified
Β 
=== References ===
:::# Adequate
:::# Incomplete
:::# Too many
Β 
=== Figures and tables ===
:::# Well prepared
:::# Poor
:::# Too many
Β 
=== Abstract ===
:::# Clear and concise
:::# Clumsy
:::# Too long
Β 
=== Language ===
:::# Acceptable
:::# In need of minor corrections
:::# In need of language editing
Β 
=== Length of the manuscript ===
:::# Adequate
:::# Too short
:::# Too long
Β 
=== General rating ===
Β 
:::# Accept
:::# Minor revision
:::# Major revision
:::# Reject
Β 
=== Overall evaluation === Β 
:::# Excellent
:::# Good
:::# Average
:::# Poor
Β 
Β 
== Ethics questions ==
::::* For animal studies and human studies, has ethical approval been obtained and so stated in the paper? For human studies has obtaining of written, informed subject consent been noted in the paper?
:::# Yes
:::# No
:::# N/A
Β 
Β 
== Review comments ==
Β 
:::* Confidential comments to the editor
::::* Please elaborate on your evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript and how the research will contribute to the field.
:::# Strengths:
:::# Weaknesses:
Β 
:::* Open review
::::* Include in your critique your judgment of the significance of the findings, the clarity of the rationale and hypotheses, accuracy of the experimental design, methods and statistical analysis, quality of data presentation, length and quality of Discussion, and inclusion of appropriate references.
Β 
::::* Please make clear any specific comments for revision.
Β 
Β 
[[File:BEC-exlibris.png|left|200px|Bioenergetics Communications]]
== Bioenergetics Communications is part of the H2020 NextGen-O2k project ==
{{NextGen-O2k H2020-support}}
Β 
Β 
[[Category:Mitochondrial Global Network]]

Latest revision as of 15:47, 14 October 2022


Bioenergetics Communications        
Gnaiger 2020 BEC MitoPathways
       
Gnaiger Erich et al ― MitoEAGLE Task Group (2020) Mitochondrial physiology. Bioenerg Commun 2020.1.
        MitoPedia: BEC         MitoPedia: Gentle Science         MitoFit Preprints         DOI Data Center
Bioenergetics Communications is the Open Science journal on bioenergetics and mitochondrial physiology with Living Communications Open Access logo.png - ISSN 2791-4690

BEC reviewers

Bioenergetics Communications
Visit the the Bioenergetics Communications website for Β» BEC board of reviewers


MitoPedia topics: BEC